Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Cover Image

The implicit parameters of the architectural aesthetic of Saoudi mosque in Chlef.

Said BOUSMAHA, Mustapha CHEIKH-ZOUAOUI, Samia CHERGUI

Abstract


This study will present an attempt to identify the implicit parameters of the architectural aesthetic of the great contemporary mosques in Algeria, including the Saoudi mosque in Chlef. Among the classic parameters of architectural aesthetics, the most cited in literature; the doric and dynamic ratio and the privileged angles, which are considered to be important factors acting on visual and mental perception and therefore on individual and collective judgments of architectural beauty.

The analysis of the exterior composition of the overall shape of the Saoudi Mosque in Chlef is part of a specific theoretical framework linked to the philosophy of art and the subjectivity of the perception of beauty, and also in an approach which will make it possible to determine the objective arguments justifying the positive perception of the aesthetics of the users. To this end, a methodological approach was defined, it consisted in determining the implicit indicators of aesthetics in two distinct levels, firstly on the architecture of the overall external envelope and then on the secondary elements such as the access porches, the minarets and domes.

The results of identifying the implicit parameters of the aesthetics of the great contemporary mosque in Chlef reveal the use of doric and dynamic proportions and privileged angles, which could serve as an objective argument for attributing the main value of architectural aesthetics to the object of study.


Keywords


architectural aesthetic; doric; dynamic; implicit parameters; privileged angle; proportion; Saoudi mosque

Full Text:

PDF

References


A.W. 1897. La valeur esthétique de la Section Dorée. Revue néo-scolastique, 199-212.

Académie Française. 1841. Dictionnaire de l'Académie française (Vol. 2). Adolphe Wahlen, Paris.

Ackermann, E. C. 1895. The golden section. The American Mathematical Monthly, 2(9-10), 260-264.

Akhtaruzzaman, M., & Shafie, A. A. 2011. Geometrical substantiation of Phi, the golden ratio and the baroque of nature, architecture, design and engineering. International Journal of Arts, 1(1), 1-22.

Alberti, L. B. 1992. De re aedificatoria (Vol. 10). Ediciones Akal.

ATTIYA, Mohsin Mohammed. 1991. L’objectif de l’art, Le Caire, Édition Dar Ethakafa.

BENARBIA, I. 2012. L’EVALUATION DE LA VALEUR ESTHETIQUE DES MONUMENTS HISTORIQUES Cas de la grande mosquée de Nédroma, Algeria.

Berger, H. 1961. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism. The New Scholasticism, 35(2), 260-265.

Bousmaha, S., Chergui, S., & Cheikh-Zouaoui, M., 2019. An assessment of the aesthetic value of the Islamic university mosque in Constantine. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 5(3), 119-128.

Currie, G., Kieran, M., Meskin, A., & Robson, J. (Eds.). 2014. Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford University Press, USA.

De Quincy, A. C. Q. 1788. Encyclopédie méthodique ou par ordre de matières : Architecture (Vol. 1). Chez Henri Agasse.

Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. 2007. The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PloS one, 2(11), e1201.

Fine, H. B. 1917. Ratio, Proportion and Measurement in the Elements of Euclid. Annals of Mathematics, 70-76.

Herz-Fischler, R. 2013. A mathematical history of the golden number. Courier Corporation.

Illies, C., & Ray, N. 2016. An aesthetic deontology: Accessible beauty as a fundamental obligation of architecture. architecture philosophy, 2(1).

Jennath, K. A., & Nidhish, P. J. 2016. Aesthetic judgement and visual impact of architectural forms: a study of library buildings. Procedia Technology, 24, 1808-1818.

Le Ray, M. 1980. Dialogue du physicien et de l'esthète. Communication & Langages, 45(1), 49-69.

Livio, M. 2008. The golden ratio: The story of phi, the world's most astonishing number. Broadway Books.

Martinache, M., Le Ray, M., & Levin, M. 1983. Les angles privilégiés dans la lecture et la rédaction des images. Journées d’études de la Société des électriciens, électroniciens et radioélectriciens, SEE, Rennes, 27-49.

Mason, R. 2002. Assessing values in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. Assessing the values of cultural heritage, 5-30.

Mathieu, J. P. 2002. The influence of privileged angles and remarkable proportions in shapes, and their relevance for marketing and product design.

Mathieu, J. P., & Le Ray, M. 2006. Universalité des formes, proportions remarquables et marketing. Management et Sciences Sociales, 2(2), 235-257.

Megahed, Y., & Gabr, H. S. 2010. Quantitative architectural aesthetic assessment. In Aesthetics+ design: Dresden international symposium; 21st biennial congress of International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, IAEA (pp. 1-14).

Pernot, L. A. U. R. E. N. T., & Pernot, L. 2011. Phidias à la barre. La rhétorique des arts, Paris, 11-43.

RAWIA, Hamouda. 1992. L’esthétique dans les pays sous-développés, Thèse de Doctorat.

Riegl, A. 2015. Le Culte moderne des monuments. Son essence et sa genèse : Son essence et sa genèse. Le Seuil.

Rossi, C. 2004. Architecture and mathematics in ancient Egypt. Cambridge University Press.

Scruton, R. 2013. The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton University Press.

ZEISING, Adolf. 1854. Nouvelle théorie des proportions des corps humains. Leipzig : Weigel.

ZEISING, Adolf. 1884. Le nombre d'or. Engelmann dans Komm.

Zevi, B., & Trichaud, L. 1959. Apprendre à voir l'architecture. Ed. De Minuit.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.